ABSTRACT
Objective@#Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) involves inflammation of the nasal and para-nasal mucosa. Due to its heterogeneous nature, unknown pathogenesis, and high recurrence rate, effective treatment is difficult. Nasal cytology is presently not a part of the routine diagnosis or treatment decision for CRS.@*Data sources@#A literature search was performed for published papers in English between January 1990 and June 2019 using MEDLINE.@*Study selection@#Terms used were chronic rhinosinusitis, eosinophils, etiology, immunopathology, inflammation, mast cells, nasal cytology, polyps, and treatment. Both reviews and original articles were collected and studied.@*Results@#There is no standard nasal fluid, mucus sampling, or staining techniques for identifying inflammatory cell types. Results were divergent from different countries. Moreover, the main focus of these papers on the cells in nasal washings was eosinophils, with infrequent mentioning of other cell types that may imply different etiology and pathology. The heterogeneous cell profile of CRS and the role of mast cells have been unappreciated due to the lack of specific immunohistochemical technique or study of its unique mediators.@*Conclusions@#Nasal cytology could help distinguish the type and the activation state of inflammatory cells. Thus it can help in providing a clearer picture of CRS pathogenesis, identifying different patient groups, and developing effective treatments.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE@#Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) involves inflammation of the nasal and para-nasal mucosa. Due to its heterogeneous nature, unknown pathogenesis, and high recurrence rate, effective treatment is difficult. Nasal cytology is presently not a part of the routine diagnosis or treatment decision for CRS.@*DATA SOURCES@#A literature search was performed for published papers in English between January 1990 and June 2019 using MEDLINE.@*STUDY SELECTION@#Terms used were chronic rhinosinusitis, eosinophils, etiology, immunopathology, inflammation, mast cells, nasal cytology, polyps, and treatment. Both reviews and original articles were collected and studied.@*RESULTS@#There is no standard nasal fluid, mucus sampling, or staining techniques for identifying inflammatory cell types. Results were divergent from different countries. Moreover, the main focus of these papers on the cells in nasal washings was eosinophils, with infrequent mentioning of other cell types that may imply different etiology and pathology. The heterogeneous cell profile of CRS and the role of mast cells have been unappreciated due to the lack of specific immunohistochemical technique or study of its unique mediators.@*CONCLUSIONS@#Nasal cytology could help distinguish the type and the activation state of inflammatory cells. Thus it can help in providing a clearer picture of CRS pathogenesis, identifying different patient groups, and developing effective treatments.
ABSTRACT
The association of headache and sinusitis was studied in 207 patients who underwent surgery for chronic sinusitis that failed to respond to medical management. Sixty nine percent of the patients had headaches and 31% did not. In 9% headache was the only symptom and the diagnosis of sinusitis was made on clinical and/or CT grounds. The pain was usually pressure in character, moderate in intensity and lasted for hours. Its location usually, but not always, pointed to the sinuses involved. Discreet sphenoid or ethmoid disease discovered on imaging may be responsible for midline pains. Sinusitis may also trigger or aggravate vascular headaches
Subject(s)
Headache/etiologyABSTRACT
Lasers have been used in otorhinolaryngology for more than 2 decades. The carbon dioxide laser has been the ideal choice for many otolaryngologists, in addition to the Nd: YAG, KTP, and argon lasers. Each of the presently available lasers has its benefits and limitations. Advances in laser technology, new laser wavelengths, and delivery systems provides more choices for clinical use. A review of the uses of lasers in otology, rhinology and head and neck surgery, and advances in technology is presented. The advantages, limitations, tissue interaction, complications, present, and future clinical applications are discussed